Ted Striphas did it for Cultural Studies, and now Matthew Thibault has done it for music education. It would be great for people to assemble this kind of comparative data across fields and disciplines.

And in related news one of the richest in the world–if not the richest–says it can’t afford the rising price of journal subscriptions.

If you’re not already caught up on the continuing student strike in Quebec, I recommend Lilian Radovac’s piece on the Chronicle of Higher Education site.

My final entry for FlowTV this year.

In other news, someone at the Society for Cinema and Media Studies Duke University Press book display had a sense of humour:

(sorry for the blurry iPhone photo and the delay — I only just synced it to the computer)

Let us descend for a moment into some rather exquisite gossip from the intellectual history of communication studies. Commenting on Herb Schiller, a scholar noted for his radicalism, James Carey said in a 2006 interview:

…he was supremely bourgeois. When the troubles began in the 1960s, Herb couldn’t be bothered. He was home reading The New York Times and clipping articles for his next book.

These words echo in my own ears, because I have found myself busy with my own academic work, while a student movement takes over McGill, Montreal and Quebec. I have been gone on speaking engagements for about half of March, which has left me out of a wide swath of events closer to home. It’s also affected my blogging, as it seems silly to write about more trivial matters when 200,000 people are taking to the streets, where Montreal police are making some really bone-headed choices (like releasing gas in my neighbourhood metro station!), and where some members of my own university — both admin and faculty — seem so irrationally consumed with maintaining order than they cannot distinguish between matters of discipline and matters of dissent.

There is a voice, perhaps Carey’s, that says I should drop everything and get involved, but I simply can’t. This state of affairs will continue for awhile as I tend various gardens, but perhaps as I catch up, I can say more about what’s going on as well.

Politics in Quebec, Montreal and McGill are as hot as they’ve been since last September. We are in the midst of a general student strike against proposed tuition increases.

Today is the national day of action, which is getting Canada-wide press coverage and deserves international coverage.

I’m at a conference right now and haven’t been around enough this month to have much intelligent to say, except that you should know this stuff is happening and that it’s a big deal.

Perhaps it’s always been this way, but from my perspective it seems that the Office for Students with Disabilities at McGill has been expanding their mandate in productive ways. Where I used to think of them as a part of student services (which they most emphatically still are), they are getting more involved in promoting both universal design for courses and disabilities studies as an academic field.

To promote their various projects, they’ve organized an ambitious series of events at McGill the week of 12-16 March. On the 15th at 2, I’ll be speaking for a few minutes on a panel entitled “Why Disability Studies?” There are a bunch of other events, notably a Saturday seminar (for which you need to register) on universal design for courses. There’s also some talk of a possible disability studies program at McGill, but I think we’d need several more committed full-time faculty for that to happen. Of course, there’s a lot of basic work that still needs to be done around accessibility and accommodation, as a walk around campus will demonstrate.

the US government just sold our loans, or what’s left of them, to a private company–once again demonstrating that like all debt, student debt is profitable for someone.

I’m increasingly immersed in my work out here now (yesterday I interviewed Tom Oberheim and Roger Linn–amazing and educational!), so this will be my last post on the #6party occupation, which ended Sunday when the police were called to escort the demonstrators from the building. (Also, I’d like to blog about other stuff.)

1. Regardless of what one thinks of the occupiers’ politics, tactics or tone, their actions were unquestionably brave and based on a clear commitment to principles. I was therefore quite disturbed by Michael di Grappa’s email to the effect that the administration’s first reaction to the occupation will be to find ways to punish the occupiers.

Despite my lefty overtones, I am actually quite law-and-order when it comes to things like wanton plagiarism (which I distinguish from accidental kinds that occur sometimes in the papers of first year students) and other forms of student academic misconduct (an area where McGill is unfortunately quite soft). But in this case, I think distinctions need to be made.

2. The administration’s new unilateral policy on demonstrations (which I am glad will be heavily revised) cannot and should not be applied retroactively to the demonstrators.

3. That policy is much too broad. It appears to allow for political speech so long as it inconveniences nobody and nobody is in any way made uncomfortable or threatened by it. Especially heinous is the idea that perceived threats to property not only trump speech rights but that they can be the basis of unilateral conversion of dissent into a disciplinary matter.

4. Already university security has singled out students and brought them up on bogus charges, this has to stop.

5. While I acknowledge that staff might well be scared of occupiers showing up in their offices, administrators could acknowledge that occupations happen and train staff to handle the situation instead of promoting a climate where staff are encouraged to fear our own undergraduate students. Administrators could also have left most of James admin building open for business and chose not to do so.

6. I also question the usefulness and integrity of casting all protests as potential threats, as the emails to all staff, faculty and students from Michael di Grappa and Jim Nicell have done. Let us not forget that the real, wanton violence done on campus last fall was at the hands of the Montreal police, who beat, pepper-sprayed and teargassed demonstrators and bystanders. As of yet, I haven’t heard reports of people injured by demonstrators.

#6party in their own words.
CKUT press release on the James Admin occupation
CKUT response to the Provost’s memo
QPIRG statement on the occupation

Also, the hate mail is starting to roll in. More on that later.

I’m writing this from a hotel in California, so I can’t very easily tell you what’s going on inside James Admin. Luckily, you have other sources you can turn to for that. Instead, I want to focus on the issues that the occupiers are trying to highlight.

Why is a group of independent students occupying the McGill administration building over funding for a community radio station and a social and environmental justice collective on campus?

Of course, MARP says “to have a party” — and while I respect that, allow me to do the bourgeois professor thing and pontificate.

There are at least three issues at stake:

1. Campus governance. Are students allowed to collectively govern how their fees are allocated? I believe their should be, but that decisions like this need to be collective and not just thousands of individual choices. That’s why you have representative student government.

2. Who has the right to make decisions regarding the mechanics through which funds are allocated? Again, the students have shown themselves capable of self-governance on the issue. Let them decide.

3. Why are two progressive student groups being singled out for new mechanisms that effectively defund them? If I have to guess–and I confess that this is based only on reading behaviour and no evidence whatsoever–this looks to the untrained eye like this has something to do with donors or members of the Board of Governors. I can’t imagine the administration getting into a sustained fight with students for this long and using so many resources, unless a lot of money or institutional support was at stake. I can’t imagine another motivation and none has been offered.

The details as I understand them:

This all goes back to how these organizations are funded and basic issues of governance. As student organizations, both CKUT and QPIRG get a portion of student fees as the basis of their budgets (as with most community radio, you can also donate to CKUT on their website).

Unlike most other student organizations and fees–regardless of their ideological stripe–students have been able to opt out of paying their fees to these organizations. This is itself a curious situation. Students can opt out of these organizations on ideological grounds, they are not allowed to opt out of allowing their fees to go to other equally ideological student organizations, like campus groups tied to political parties, religions, nationalities, or for that matter, the athletics fee, and whatever portion of their money goes to support university athletics.*

In the past, opting out was done manually, by going in and requesting a refund. But, to quote a QPIRG press release:

The system of online opt-outs was imposed unilaterally by the McGill Administration in 2007, ignoring objections from campus groups regarding this violation of student autonomy. In 2007, a SSMU General Assembly motion and subsequent student referendum called upon the Administration to put an end to the online opt-out system. Both the motion and the referendum passed, but both results were ignored by the McGill Administration.

In other words, the elected bodies that represent students didn’t want the online opt-out. An email from Provost Tony Masi to all faculty, students, and staff claims this was in the name of “efficiency,” and it is true that it has made it much more efficient for people to opt out, but this is precisely the problem. Efficient for whom and on what basis? Who requires this “efficiency”?

This past November, the students held another referendum on whether the online opt-out should continue. Again, the students voted “no” overwhelmingly. Deputy Provost Morton Mendelson (who is the target of the occupation) has said repeatedly that the referendum question was unclear and that the administration will not recognize the result. From Masi’s email:

Here is the text of the November referendum question for CKUT; the QPIRG question used similar language:
Do you support CKUT continuing as a recognized student activity supported by a fee of $4.00 per semester for full-time undergraduate students, which is not opt-outable on the Minerva online opt-out system but is directly refundable through CKUT, with the understanding that a majority “no” vote will result in the termination of all undergraduate funding to CKUT?

Thus, the question for each group asked two things at once:
1) Do you support the existence of the organization?
2) Do you support going back to back to the old system – to have the fee be “directly refundable” to the student from the organization (in person) and thus remove the option to opt-out online?

Yes, the referendum was on two questions at once. If the majority of a 200-student intro-level undergrad class can come to understand and make use of a morsel of Pierre Bourdieu’s social theory–a feat my undergraduates accomplish each fall–surely they can understand a clearly worded referendum on two inextricably related questions.

Today’s McGill Daily reports that the administration and CKUT have agree to a third referendum to decide the issue. But to call this a good thing is to lose the forest for the trees. The point is not that the administration has finally agreed to yet another referendum on an issue where students have already spoken clearly.

The issue is whether students should be able to govern themselves on issues like student fees and student organizations, which would include things like setting the terms by which collective decisions should be made.

I think they should.

—

*(To be clear, I don’t know if they should be allowed to opt out. It’s not like I can stop paying taxes just because I don’t like Charet or Harper’s policies (or for that matter Obama’s–since I pay in two countries). Student elect representatives to dole out the funds. That should be enough. But that’s a side issue.)

Things you need to know:

1. Students are occupying the James Administration building in protest of Deputy Provost Morton Mendelson’s efforts to de-fund CKUT and QPIRG.

2. For reasons that will have to be considered in another post, all McGill faculty, staff and students will now apparently receive an email any time anyone at a university protests anything.

3. This morning’s email announcing the closure of James Admin (reproduced below) actually links to the Milton Avenue Revolutionary Press (yes, that’s MARP for short), which is liveblogging the occupation. If you follow the link, you will understand why I find this to be surreal.

I worry MARP may not be all that legible to people who aren’t already familiar with the local campus politics. I’m flying away soon, so if nobody else explains it clearly, I’ll try tonight or tomorrow.

In the meantime, you can follow the occupation on twitter via @6partylive and @miltrevpress

Today’s official communiqué:

Message to the McGill community
Update on the James Bldg occupation
From Michael Di Grappa, Vice-Principal (Administration and Finance)

We would like to bring you up to date on the status of the occupation of the offices of the Deputy Provost (Student Life and Learning) on the 6th floor of the James Administration Building and in the building’s first-floor lobby.

The James Building remains closed today, so alternate work arrangements have been made for the people who work there. James Building staff are relocated or working from home, continuing to provide services as best they can under the circumstances. Services normally provided to graduate students and postdoctoral fellows in the James Building have been relocated to Service Point, on McTavish Street in the ground floor of the McLennan Library Building. Graduate program offices should contact their normal GPS staff contact by email today. Students, faculty and staff who need to access other services can contact people or offices via email. If you cannot reach anyone, please send a note to info.mcgill@mcgill.ca, and someone will respond as quickly as possible with the appropriate information. Again, we regret any inconveniences or interruptions in service you may experience as a result of the occupation.

As yesterday’s email mentioned, the occupiers were given a notice from Provost Masi (found at http://www.mcgill.ca/channels/announcements/item/?item_id=213952). Yesterday, Professor Jim Nicell talked several times with designated representatives of the occupiers in an attempt to get the protestors to leave the building. The protestors are refusing to leave unless their demands are met, as listed on this blog (please note that the blog does contain profanity): http://miltonrevolutionarypress.wordpress.com/2012/02/07/live-partyblog-from-mendelsons-surprise-resignation-party-welcome-back-ckut-qpirg-party/

We will continue to attempt to talk to the occupiers about them leaving the building peacefully. We hope for a rapid, peaceful end to this unacceptable situation.

Message à la communauté mcgilloise de Michael Di Grappa, vice-principal (administration et finances)

Mise à jour sur l’occupation du Pavillon James

Voici une mise à jour concernant l’occupation des bureaux du premier vice-principal exécutif adjoint (études et vie étudiante) au 6e étage et dans le hall du rez-de-chaussée du Pavillon de l’administration James.

Le Pavillon James demeure fermé aujourd’hui, et des dispositions ont été prises afin que les employés qui y ont leur bureau puissent poursuivre leur travail. En dépit des circonstances actuelles, le personnel s’efforce de maintenir les services offerts en temps normal. Les services normalement offerts aux étudiants des cycles supérieurs et boursiers de recherche postdoctorale ont été déplacés au Point de service, situé au rez-de-chaussée de la Bibliothèque McLennan, rue McTavish. Aujourd’hui, les responsables de bureaux d’études supérieures doivent communiquer avec leur personnel régulier. Étudiants, professeurs et employés qui désirent obtenir l’un ou l’autre des services offerts peuvent joindre le personnel en charge par courriel. S’il vous est impossible de joindre quiconque, veuillez envoyer un courriel à info.mcgill@mcgill.ca, et l’information demandée vous sera transmise dans les meilleurs délais. Sachez que nous sommes désolés des problèmes et des retards causés par cette situation.

Tel que mentionné dans le courriel d’hier, les manifestants ont reçu un message de la part du vice-principal exécutif Masi, que vous pouvez consulter à : http://francais.mcgill.ca/channels/announcements/item/?item_id=213952. Hier, le professeur Jim Nicell s’est adressé aux occupants à plusieurs reprises afin de les amener à quitter les lieux. Comme vous pourrez le lire sur ce blogue – qui comporte des propos offensants – les manifestants refusent d’obtempérer tant que l’Université n’aura pas répondu à leurs demandes. http://miltonrevolutionarypress.wordpress.com/2012/02/07/live-partyblog-from-mendelsons-surprise-resignation-party-welcome-back-ckut-qpirg-party/

Nous poursuivons nos tentatives visant à convaincre les occupants de quitter les lieux dans le calme. Nous espérons mettre rapidement un terme à cette situation inacceptable, et ce, de manière pacifique.