Circle of Triceratops

is a phrase uttered by young Eva, who received a dinosaur book from Carrie. It contains a picture of a well, you know. Anyway, I figured it would be a good name for a heavy rock band. If I find my heavy band and they have a sense of humor, well then watch out world.

Good lord, it really has been a week, hasn’t it? we had company through Tuesday, Wednesday was recovery, and then the rest of the week just slipped by without a blog post. And so, to get my chops back, I bring you the following meme.

Total Volume of Music Files on My Computer: 15.55 GB

The Last CD I Bought Was: Metallica, St. Anger

First of all, let me point out that I could have lied but I am telling you the truth. But the fact of the matter is that we saw Some Kind of Monster, which I highly recommend. Not only was the movie funny, but some of the music sounded pretty good. Unfortunately, the album pretty much sucks, as I verified on a careful listed today. The lyrics are embarrassingly bad and mixed high enough that you can’t ignore them. Not only is the songwriting bad, but the mix is, well bizarre and not in a good way. There are a few moments of riffage that I recognize from the movie, but definitely not worth it.

Song Playing Right Now: “The Life and Death of Mr.Badmouth”, PJ Harvey. PJ Harvey has the most rock and roll voice in existence.

Five Songs I Listen To a Lot, Or That Mean a Lot To Me:

Hoo-boy. I’m not a song guy. I’m an album guy. I’m also not a lyrics guy, so this will get weird. But here goes, in no order of significance:

1. Houston, “Sunday in December.” 1:57 of pure unadulterated rock. Amazingly crafted song — pretty, singsongy and intense all at once. Didn’t live up to the hype live, but then we only got to see them once.

2. Bill Lasswell, “Cybotron.” And the message of this song is. . . . “smoke more dope.” Actually, that’s the message of Bill Lasswell’s entire oeuvre, I think. But actually I am particularly fond of this one for its bowel shaking bassline. It occurs to me at this moment that I should do an entry about basslines. That will come under separate cover.

3. Pink Floyd, “Another Brick in the Wall Part I”. I was 13, about to turn 14. Pete Tveten told me to lay down next to the speaker and he put on side 1 of the Wall. I had no idea you could do that with rock music. Later in 9th grade, my knowledge of Pink Floyd temporarily made me cooler with the other kids than I might otherwise have been. Aesthetic pleasure and utility, all wrapped up in one. I find the song a little laborious now, but then, I would, wouldn’t I? Note: this experience also sent me on what now might be regarded as a somewhat unfortunate art-rock craze. But hey, it’s my list and I’m sticking to it.

4. Prefuse 73 “The End of Biters–International”: I dunno, two short songs on here (this one clocks in at 1:17) seems indulgent since most things I listen to are longer, but I really know of no other song that sounds like this one. It stands out from all of his other work and doesn’t sound like anyone else. Really remarkable piece of music.

5. Enon “Biofeedback” annoys the hell out of Carrie and there’s nothing quite as funny as annoying the one you love. Actually, there’s this old Free Range Chicken song, “Ali Baba” that also did the trick, but since I actually like the Enon song quite a bit, there’s an added bonus in playing that one.

Okay, off to a party.

Montreal Modernism

We just returned from the CCA’s “Montreal Thinks Big” exhibit on Montreal in the 1960s. Absolutely amazing stuff. Lots of plans for the decaying infrastructure we walk through every day, as well as alternative plans that were never built. Some political critiques of 60s style development as well, though they were well hidden. We also had a short jaunt through Douglas Coupland’s lego exhibit, which was interesting, but not as interesting as the history. It’s really striking how much of that dream of a “multilevel” downtown is still in effect, even though it also occasioned a certain level of gentrification (of which we are a part, though not in downtown) and may have actually decreased the level of cross-class interaction in public space. It also punched a hole in my childlike love of the Metro, since it (along with busses) replaced a cheaper and more flexible tram system.

As a special bonus, the bookstore was outstanding. Perhaps a little too outstanding if you know what I mean.

Jesus it’s hot.

Back to hanging out with the in-laws after a brief foray into New Rules:

New Rules

1. Always take the boat tour.
2. Enchiladas are most work than you think they will be, but they are their own reward.
3. Museum attendance is structurally homologous to shopping but requires more concentration.
4. Always install the window air conditioning as soon as possible.
5. Yes, that pay-per-view movie that you’ve never heard of but looks like it might be good will probably suck.

Swiffer Theory

A guest entry by Carrie.

I feel I need to take the opportunity to share with you all a strange realization I had just this morning while assembling my new Swiffer Wet Jet, a “power mop” I asked my mate to purchase for me to ease the terrible burden of mopping 1500 sq. ft. of bare floor. I am fully willing to admit that this division of labor (me mopping the floor and Jon purchasing the mop for me) is gendered in the utmost of traditional ways. For some reason, which I prefer not to examine too closely, it feels better to me that I received this mop as a “gift” rather than purchasing it for myself. I think Jon’s purchase of the mop makes it seem to me that my mopping labour [editor’s note: she is already internalizing Canadian spellings!] is getting more recognition than I might otherwise perceive if I bought the damn thing. There’s a definite psychology to the gendered reality of domestic home engineering. Just to be clear: Jon vacuums all of the floors before I mop — the gendered division is a really a sub-division of various kinds of cleaning tasks. They still suck, though.

In any event, the gendered conditions of the mop’s purchase and use are not nearly as interesting as the creepy design of the device. After a mere ten minutes assembling the mop and gazing at it rather quizzically, I’ve decided that this device has distilled the fundamental technological tools of women’s reproductive systems and cycles into a plastic and aluminum “power mop.” Let me explain. The mop’s key feature is that it doesn’t require you to use a pail of soapy water: cleaning solution and everything are contained within the mop unit itself. It’s truly an all-in-one device. As I opened the package of thin, wafer-like papery mop heads that the mop user is supposed to just stick the grippy, rubbery strips on the mop head itself, I realized that these mop heads are simply enlarged sanitary napkins, also known as menstrual pads. For those of you reading this blog entry who are familiar with different brands of sanitary napkins, the material on the mop head that comes into contact with the floor is the same material that covers Always brand “dri-weave” menstrual pads. The back side of the mop pad uses that wispy, slightly adhesive feeling lighter plastic fiber material that often covers the back side, and/or sides, or older or off-brands of maxi-pad: that material that never quite sticks to the filling of the menstrual pad, and ends up being really uncomfortable and kind of shifty in the pants, or gets caught up in the folds of feminine flesh. The mop pad even has something resembling “wings,” but there’s nothing to stick them to. I don’t fully know how to explain my reaction to the realization that I was putting a menstrual pad-like mop head on my new mop, except that I have been marveling in the mop makers’ re-appropriation of the unique textile and fiber construction of menstrual pads and baby diapers.

The mop’s gendered re-construction of the female reproductive system doesn’t stop with its re-appropriation of the menstrual pad. It also re-purposes the design of the baby bottle, and in particular, the rubber nipple, in its design of the made-for-the-Swiffer-Wet-Jet cleaning solution bottles. The bottles attach directly to the mop, and are applied by sliding the bottle, with its flat rubber nipple cap, arrow side down into the sharp looking cleaning-bottle mop seat. The assembly directions detail in clear warning-label language not to put your bare hands into the parts where the bottle goes because of the device’s sharp, yet mostly hidden parts. I really don’t see anything that looks even remotely sharp on this part of the device. But like a young infant with newly emerged sharp little teeth, the Swiffer Wet Jet can bite your unsuspecting soft parts and draw blood. After I slide the bottle in upside down, the mop appears ready to go (I also had to add 4 AA batteries — this is a “power” mop).

What does this mop say about gender and reproduction, and the merging of domestic cleaning technologies and throw-away products like plastic menstrual pads and rubber nipples? What do I make of the fact that my mop sprays its precious cleaning fluid in a half-moon pattern onto the dirty floor? I feel a kind of familiar connection to this mop, because I’ve seen all of its parts before. At the moment, I simply marvel at the ways my Swiffer Wet Jet recycles menstrual pad technology and the old stand by, rubber nipples. We’ll have to see how it works.

Editor’s note: after mopping the dining room and kitchen floors, she said the mop “fucking rocks.”

New BS Oped + More Tapes

First things first: a new Bad Subjects OpEd on the EU vote is up. Short and sweet, I searched for the profound but only found the suggestive.

Now, I have to say I am totally blown away by the response to the tape post. I got a bunch of awesome emails and comments. This must really be a thing. I wonder if it would be cool to listen to other people’s half-baked band demos? What would happen if Dave Noon and I traded high school tapes? Or better yet consumed them together. Also, how gendered is this? There are women who do this sort of thing but was it mostly a “guy thing” to amass such bizarre recordings?

I did forget to mention that I have about 6-8 hours of video footage of my undergrad band. I know where that is. It moves every time with me without question, but it’s best not watched. . . . In that category, we also have the official yearbook video from Carrie’s high school.

Coming soon: I’ve been memed!

Plus: in-law arrive tomorrow night. More vacuuming is in the near future; and I may be a little scarce for a few days. We’ll see.

Farewell to a Medium; Or, Destroying My Library

Yes, that’s an obligatory reference to Benjamin’s essay on unpacking his library. But it’s a different story, you see.

At some point when I was moving around during my undergrad years, I dumped my entire collection of cassette tapes into a giant box. the kind you put your kitchen dishes into. ALL of them. Immediately prior to that dumping, I can’t say that the tapes were very well organized. There were many unlabelled tapes, and many tapes lived happy lives in the box while separated from their covers. Now, for several years that the collection was in this absurd condition, I continued to use it. For instance, I would listen to tapes in the car as I drove around town or went on road trips.

However, it was the compact disc that dealt the biggest blow to the collection. I stopped acquiring tapes, and curiously, not long after that I stopped recording stuff to tape myself. And so the collection sat, in its giant box. I actually can’t remember where it lived in our tiny Urbana duplex but I think it moved at some point from an “out in the room” phase to an “in the closet” phase. there it lived. When we moved to Pittsburgh, I promised Carrie I’d go through the collection. In the meantime, it sat in a storage room in our basement.

Five years later, as we were moving to Montreal, I again promised Carrie that I would go through the tape box. If we bring it along, I said, I’ll dispatch it in August before school starts. In the meantime, it sat in the living room. It had to. There isn’t a lot of backspace in our apartment. In preparation, we picked up a few shoebox-sized boxes in pretty colors to house the tapes that would survive the purge.

And so the box of tapes sat in the living room until this weekend.

It all started because I wanted to dig out an old tape of one of my former bands. There’s a story behind that, but for another post. In the process, I started going through the tapes. Once I found the tape, I broke off the project and spent the afternoon digitizing the song I was looking for. But having begun the project, it seemed fitting to follow through. Together with Carrie on Sunday morning, I went through a mountain of old tapes. We wrote down the ones we intend to replace on CD(1) and the rest we tossed unceremonially. Since many of these tapes are between 15 and 20 years old, it’s not like they sound good.

Still, there was a lot to keep. For starters, a small segment of my collection was well preserved inside special tape boxes I’d inherited from my brother. They have the 1970s faux-wood on them and everything. These tapes fall into two categories: 1) recordings of bands I’ve been in; 2) bootlegs of bands I liked in the late 1980s. Mostly Pink Floyd and King Crimson. A little Husker Du, though. We kept that stuff, along with anything else that was deemed not replaceable and of some interest. A small collection of tapes of you’ve-never-heard-of-them bands that my you’ve-never-heard-of-them bands played with over the years. Mix tapes from friends. Albums of defunct local bands that I liked. Two tapes that actually contain software programs for the Timex Sinclair Computer. And a pink copy of Led Zeppelin IV, which I think came out during its first run and belonged to my brother. Those three things will wind up in the Museum of Quirky Communication Technologies. I also found a 1990 Paul Wellstone for Senate pin. How cool is that?

There was the pile of unlabelled tapes. And cryptically labelled tapes. Those had to be listened to. Most of them were crap, but there were some gems. Someone had recorded a right wing speech, complete with audience heckling. Sounds good. Keep it. Lots of demo versions of songs from my undergrad days, including alternate arrangments. Kind of cool. Keep em. Carrie’s spoken field notes from her undergrad thesis on striptease. Keep it.

The most freaky tape, though, was a recording of a high school day I made, probably in early 1989 but it could be early 1988. There is no relevant written information. I know it’s winter because I trudge through a snowbank.

It starts with me struggling to get my car started in the morning and goes from there. I could only stand about 10 minutes of it (I skipped around) but I sound like, well, a geeky high school kid. Lots of banter with other kids who are in other rock bands in the school, lots of ironic wit about other people. I seem to have a lot of friends, but I can’t quite place about half the voices. I know it’s Jon York when he says that his father was the first thing he saw in the morning, but I can’t quite tell who’s narrating the story of the student council meeting where Anthony Meyer made a plea for our friend’s Really Weird Band to be included in the winter games battle of the bands.(2) Yeah, ours was a big world full of important things. Like Youth in Government. At one point, I stop by the principal’s office to make sure he gets the list of people who will miss school for it, which of course includes me. The deal is that the voice on the tape is clearly me. But of course it’s also not. That’s how recording has always worked, and yesterday was no different in the grand design. At least I had the decency to edit. there’s a lot of cutting from scene to scene. I think it’s only passing times and so forth, but there may be a class in there.

Needless to say, the tape inspires a feeling of abject horror in me, but I cannot stand to throw it away. I also can’t stand to listen to more of it. Somehow pictures from that time are less disturbing to me.

So it is now stored away with the rest of the collection. There’s always the possibility of using it as source material for granular synthesis or something.

—*—

What is most striking to me about this mass of tapes, though, is the continued conviviality to the compact cassette form. Cassettes were easy. They never sounded great, rewinding was boring, and they deteriorated easily, but they were incredibly easy to use. I liked recording, as did my bandmates in high school and college, and so it was a big casual part of our lives. Record practices, record shows. Take the hand held recorder to school for a day and record what it’s like to be a student at my high school, or at least what it’s like to be me in that subject position. Borrow some friends’ instruments and play with the 4-track. Record a speech, record a theatrical scenario my friends and I dream up, record field notes, record meetings, record classes. Record anything I wanted, whenever I felt like it, with little effort.

Somehow, even though it’s all much better sounding and much more powerful, in the process of acquiring, learning and using all this digital recording equipment I now have has turned recording into A Big Deal. It is a A Big Deal to record something at home, to have a home studio, and to make stuff that sounds good. It’s true that I could get some kind of portable digital recorder — which I may do (or I can just borrow a voice recorder from a colleague) — but I was absolutely shocked at how I thought about recording now vs. how I thought about it then. It’s a bigger part of my life, I guess, in that it’s a skill I have. And yet, I do a whole lot less of it than when I was a kid messing around with a tape recorder.

1. And just like that, I’m a record industry statistic. As they run out of baby boomers to replace their vinyl collections on CD (which artificially propped up CD sales in the 1990s), here’s me about to do that for a segment of my tape collection. Of course, most of the really important stuff I had on vinyl, which I still have.

2. A cynic would point out that academic gossip pretty much sounds that same: “we fought for this really good project to get in the collection, but they just wanted crap.” Or “what idiot is programming the conference this year? it seems like they’re edging out critical work.” You know how it goes. . . .

Hokey Tenure Post

You may or may not recall my post from last fall about tenure (linked here in case you missed it), but the gist was that after 5 years of epic labor, it all ends with a giant, kindergarten-like arts and crafts project. And then waiting, a lot of it. For those of you who aren’t academics or aren’t yet tenured, here’s how it ends when it ends well: with a single-page letter on letterhead with official notice, some language the lawyers made them put in, and then sincere congratulations and wishes for future success (which is probably code for “please don’t become dead wood. We would be very sorry if that happened.”)

I know this because while I was away in Holland last week, the letter finally arrived: the official letter that grants me tenure and promotion to associate professor. My colleague Darin Barney, who was in the same situation as me, emailed me the news and instructed me to go have a drink immediately. I think I read his note at about 7:30am Amsterdam time, so the celebration was delayed (I had respondent duties later in the day). But I did indeed celebrate.(1)

And I intend to continue. Back in Minnesota, I once had a drummer who repeatedly got his girlfriend to take him out for expensive dinners around his birthday. She would take him out, and then the next time he would offer the same rationale: “it’s my birthday.” We reckoned that his birthday lasted an entire month. So I am officially declaring the summer of 2005 a “drummer’s birthday.” The celebration will go on for as long as I can possibly extend it, though I promise not to make Carrie take me out for tons of expensive dinners.

As for how it feels to get tenure, that would depend upon whom you ask. If you go to the Chronicle of Higher Education website, you can find people who are really depressed or confused now that they have tenure. Check the “first person” columns and the discussion boards.

Me? I’m just happy.(2) As I said in the fall, the reward of the profession is the chance to do the work. So I will. Of course, I can also go off on some self-indulgent tanget with no scholarly purpose, like starting a blog (d’oh!). Knowing that it really is a choice from here on out is cool. Now I get to rethink what it all means. Or not, as I see fit.

1. The first drink was, appropriately, to “fallen comrades.” It’s not a war, but every year the process has its casualties.
2. Of course, there’s the dark side of the business, as Dave Noon reminds us.