Or maybe just not blogging enough. After my big declarations about being a full time audio engineer, I’ve been back at work for “the man” for the past couple days to catch up with some promises I’d made long ago. Such is my lot. Mixing will resume on Thursday or Friday, by which time my permission codes for a tasty new reverb plugin should have arrived.
I have been trying to think of something profound to say about the London bombings, but I’ve got nothing. Here’s a Bad Subjects editorial on them, though.
Bienvenue a Quebec
or so said the post-it note on the letter we got from Quebec immigration last week. We have officially received our certificates of selection, which means that we probably are about halfway through the process or a little further. They didn’t even interview us, though we had to have a friend sign for us. All that’s left is for us to be fingerprinted, to write to the FBI and State Police, take a couple medical exams, and of course about $3000 later and we should have permanent residency by this time next year if not sooner. I’m psyched.
I also learned last week, and a cursory web search seems to confirm this, that it is no longer the case that becoming a Canadian citizen endangers one’s American citizenship, unless the person deliberately renounces his or her US citizenship (nb: this is a very bad idea and makes people at the consulate very angry). It would be nice to be able to vote here. . . .
Blogxiety, or a Meta-Note
It occasionally weighs on my mind that this blog is public, under my own name, and on my own professional website. A Friday op-ed in Chronicle of Higher Education(1) basically casts bloggers as shallow, unprofessional or out and out stupid (granted that yes, if you blog under your own name about your job search, maybe the search committee will be pissed off and maybe your are stupid). In general, I think a lot of academics, like a lot of people, have a hostility to the genre if they’re not particularly comfortable with the ‘net, or not familiar with the wide range of blogs out there.(2) It’s not unique to me — my friend Kim Dot Dammit expressed a similar anxiety earlier today. Granted, her blog is way more confessional than mine but I think we’re on the same continuum.(3) While I will cop to some personal foibles now and then, you won’t find me airing out my colleagues’ dirty laundry or disclosing personal secrets (like the real identity of “anonymous football fan”). And still, since I don’t fancy myself an amateur journalist (that’s amateur musician and engineer thankyouverymuch) , there’s going to be an element of banality to the writing, especially since I pretty much only read blogs by my friends. It is probably weird that such a blog appears on my professional website.
But then, I’m a real person. I guess that’s the whole point to the blog, to my (granted, sorely-in-need-of-updating) music page, and a variety of other parts of my site. It does suggest that something important is changing about self-presentation among academics in the humanities at least. I’ve tended to be against the neverending expansion of informality in the university that masks power relationships where they remain and where they are relevant. But this, this is something different again.
—
1. The one publication that does more to profit off job market anxiety in the humanities than any other.
2. The notion of blogging as self-indulgence or aggrandisement, or worse, as existing in a zero-sum relationship with other writing, is particularly noxious.
3. Interestingly, Kim made the very conscious decision to blog under an alias awhile back and still has this concern. I also notice that most of the grad student bloggers in AHCS blog under aliases. Probably a good idea if you’re going to be confessional.