Super Bon! – Page 2 – Naturalized, but not natural

Update and a Brief Detour into Existentialism

You know how people sometimes post really personal stuff on social media and then say “I might delete this later?” Yeah, this is one of those posts.

The update: I am surviving ok at home. I’m in some kind of steady state where I am not in immediate danger, but I also hate this. My oxygen is still too low and I need to rest after prepping breakfast or cleaning up thereafter. The coughing fits also just kill me. I am still having trouble swallowing and have to eat and drink very slowly and intentionally or my throat goes into spasm and I gak (<–my technical term). Relearning how to eat is hard! But I think my throat is healing some as there is now almost no blood in my phleghm. I am still in that phase of figuring out what med to take when. Yesterday my heart rate was all up and down in a most unpleasant fashion. Today it’s more steady because–I think?–I timed my new asthma drugs differently.

I am being well looked after by friends. I can socialize for a few hours as long as I am just sitting, and the people around me don’t mind an absolutely horrific coughing fit from time to time. I was ferried to a friend’s house last night for the US VP debate, which was predictably awful, but I had a wonderful time with the company. I am determined to go for a short walk today, with my cane, at whatever speed is slow enough, just to get some fresh air. Radcliffe has been great so I can at least remotely tune in to other fellows’ talks.

Doctoring: tomorrow I see the pulmonologist, Friday morning, I establish primary care, and the following Friday, I meet a local oncologist who is a world expert in my condition.

Carrie arrives late Friday afternoon, which will be fucking great.

—

A Detour Through Existentialism to Explain My Attitude:

In response to reading my writing about illness, some people ask me about the style with which I write. Some call it “optimistic” or “upbeat” or “inspiring” (<–I know this is a banned word in disability land but let’s give people some grace). How, they ask, do I maintain such a positive attitude?

Here’s your answer: existentialism. My suffering is utterly, inherently, fundamentally, meaningless. It is not a cosmic punishment for anything. It is also not a challenge thrown before me to improve my character. It offers me no moral authority, and it does not morally degrade me in any way. It just is. I have no motivation to lean into it or to continue to suffer.

Writing about my own illness, even making fun of it, is a way of giving it shape and form. Intellectualizing it–to a degree–helps me feel some distance, and offers me whatever perspective I need. Of course I have to be able to do that. The first couple days of hospitalization last week made that impossible. Now I have time to reflect, so I narrate.

As you may know, existentialism is a baggy collection of philosophies (and philosophers) who argued that for people, the primary challenge of existence is coming to terms with its givenness and with their own mortality. It is a rejection of the metaphysical meanings imposed by organized religion, as well as the social meanings often imposed by institutions <–This is a gross oversimplification but this blog is not where I am going to parse Jaspers, Buber, Heidegger, Sartre and de Beauvoir. Nobody wants that.

I think my conversion moment happened 12th grade in Mr. Mossberg’s humanities course. I was raised Jewish and to be Very Jewish. Because it was determined that I was good at book learning, I was supposed to pious, and was subjected to years of Hebrew school after school and on weekends. To me, so much of the religion I was being taught seemed hollow, authoritarian, and without any real meaning or joy (my views on religion have evolved but this is what I felt at the time). I did, however, get my love of close reading and footnotes from Mr. Blackman, who specialized in Qabbalic readings of scripture, so big thanks to him for that. Anyway, the Jewish education didn’t take, and neither did the Zionist education — but that’s a story for another time.

I was a person without religion, despite having been given a whole lot of it up to about age 14, when I finally convinced my parents to let me stop going to Hebrew school. This is where Mr Mossberg’s class came in. It was greatest hits of Western philosophy. We read a little Camus — I think — and then watched a filmstrip in class. In my mind, the filmstrip is the conversion moment. It was all in blue and brown hues. The illustrations were all that sort of empty post-war European modernist vibe tinged with the lonely overtones of American painting and social theory, and the music might as well have been Schoenberg. Knowing what I know about film and TV history, let’s say this filmstrip was made in the 1960s, and being shown in 1988 0r early 1989. It went something like this.

[Opening slide, including portentious title about existentialism, and some kind of overture.]

DING

[Man walking alone in the rain, in the city. Definitely wearing a hat and an overcoat.]

“Man must reckon with a simple fact. One day he will die.”

DING

[Another image of “mass man” walking in a crowded city, but utterly alone.]

DING

“Life has no meaning that is given to us. It is up to us to determine its meaning.”

DING

..and so on.

My 18 year old mind basically exploded. Here was a worldview that implied both freedom and absolute finitude, and that made clear both conditions imposed demands on the subject. I don’t claim that I fully understood all that either then or now. But this basic perspective has shaped my towards my own illness, my relationships to others, my relationship to others’ beliefs that are not my own (I consider myself the world’s least militant agnostic), to the various emotional and psychological struggles I’ve had in adulthood, to my sense of justice and fairness.

As narrated in that filmstrip, and in some of the more macho writings in the tradition, I think existentialism gives the subject too much credit and too much power. And its universalism is probably indefensible from any modern theoretical position. With cancer, anyway, apart from being a compliant patient, I’ve really ceded control to my doctors and those around me, and to the illness itself. Maybe my interest in modular synthesis lines up with that–an endless exploration of the possibilities of control in another space in my life as a sort of compensation, I don’t know.

Intellectually, I don’t do much with this strain of thought in my scholarship, apart from some edges of the phenomenology in Diminished Faculties. I’m too uncomfortable with the tradition’s universalism and I haven’t found existentialist writers with whom I connect politically. I prefer more radical and collectivist traditions.But I think that filmstrip somehow does a good job of explaining why I react to my illness the way I do. I can savour the moments of happiness and connection in my life even as I am suffering because I see those two things as morally unrelated. They can simply coexist.

There is also a disability studies critique in here. Western medicine, and its reflection in popular culture, is incredibly moralistic. It implies people have much more control over their health than they do. It implies that the sick, the dying, the injured, are a burden on the healthy, rather than a turn that we all take if we live long enough. This also means I have become shameless about asking for help when I want and need it, with the caveat that the help I want isn’t always the “standard” help that people expect to want.

So in asserting that there is no given meaning to my illness, I am emphatically rejecting the moralistic worldview of illness and debility and everything that goes with it. At the same time, I have had people say they felt bad about feeling bad about going through whatever they were going through while I was dealing with my mess “so well.” I’m sad to hear that. Misery has no means test. It’s normal and fine to be unhappy when you feel like shit. I spend a good chunk of my day annoyed at my limitations right now and feeling like I’m missing out on the joys of sabbatical. What I wouldn’t give to be able to go into the office every day right now! But that’s not the only thing I feel, and so I just try to go out there and confront the whole catastrophe.

All I can say is that it works for me, for now. If I’m true to that existentialist kernel, then that also implies how I think about it for others. This might not work for anyone else. It’s up to you to figure out what works for you.

Maybe cancer crawl: 28 Sep 2024

Big news. I’m writing this from my dining room table at home. It’s nice. The only beeping I’ll hear today is from appliances if I use them, or perhaps a synthesizer if I get frisky (maybe in a few days). I am definitely exhausted from 5 days in hospital but I can just chill here and I have friends who have offered to help me in various ways.

There was not much new information yesterday. I spoke with my oncologist in Montreal, who has been great. As you might expect the Quebec and Mass General Brigham medical systems are not totally compatible (more on that below) so we can’t look at Monday’s CT scan side-by-side with the CT scan from August right before I left. The written reports look very similar but there is a discrepancy in language that could indicate something important, or it could indicate two sets of people looking at nearly identical images and using different words to say the same thing. #communicationstudies. New information will be coming though.

Monday morning I have a biopsy to remove some fluid from my lungs for diagnostic purposes. I am secretly-yet-not-secretly hoping that it might also feel good if they remove enough liquid/there is enough liquid to remove. I have no idea if I am phlegm producing machine or it’s all just in there.

Thursday I see a pulmonologist. Friday I see an osteopath who can also be my primary care doctor (apparently the only one in the area, very cool). The following Friday I should have an appointment with a world-famous oncologist with expertise in my kind of cancer. I totally trust my Montreal doctor, but I’m here and he’s not. And he is fine with coordinating care for my time here.

—

Some more scattered observations on for-profit healthcare vs Quebec system:

Privacy and access to information. US systems now have this whole “patient portal” which is amazing. All of your test results and info from visits, etc., in one place and everything can be downloaded as a PDF. This is so convenient–I could email my home oncologist my CT scan report, and could also send him blood tests or anything else he wants. However, in a year or two I TOTALLY expect to get an email from a random law firm saying something like

“We are writing on behalf of Mass General Brigham. We are very sorry to inform you that there has been a data breach and all of you data have been stolen. He is a free 1-year subscription to some suboptimal credit reporting service to check your credit. Sorry for sharing all those questions about your sexual identity, religious beliefs, and ethnicity on the dark web. Please accept our sincere apologies. This was unavoidable.”

My evidence for this hypothesis: Eisai Care (I am not making that name up), the for-profit company that oversees the distribution of my cancer meds in Canada, sent me a letter more or less like that (minus some details) earlier this summer. I now have a free 1-year subscription to a credit-reporting agency, and info about my cancer diagnosis and treatment are floating around on the dark web.

Meanwhile, Jewish General in Montreal lets you walk into a room and request any kind of documentation you want–in person. If you want to do it remotely, you have to do it by old-fashioned postal mail, provide lots of documentation that it’s you, and be very specific in your request. Quebec privacy law (and practice) is fantastic this way. But obviously it would be nice to get an exception for treatment crises like this one. OTOH: I love that I can neither confirm nor deny to parents whether their kid is enrolled in my undergrad lecture course.

IMPORTANT EDIT: I was wrong about something important. I knew that unlike in the US, all Quebec doctors have access to all my information, whereas US doctors may work in different proprietary systems. But I thought I did not have access. My friend Francine corrected me: there is a patient portal in Quebec, it’s just not as fast as in the US. (Up to 30 days for reports to appear for patients.) Like in the US, you still can’t get the actual images so that’s still an issue for my case specifically. I CAN’T BELIEVE I DIDN’T KNOW I HAD A PATIENT PORTAL IN QUEBEC UNTIL NOW!

Professional structures and power. The power structures are totally different here and in Quebec. Last night I got home from the hospital around 6:30pm. They sent my prescriptions to the Walgreens around the corner. There was an error. This makes sense because I was being followed by a lot of people at the hospital, and a resident who was not the primary person following me wrote up the order. I was supposed to get Albuterol, plus a cocktail including Albuterol that could be nebulized through a…nebulizer. The prescriptions that came through did not include an inhaler or a nebulizer, so I was being given medicines that I could not actually take. Also one of my meds was not covered by my health plan.

In Quebec, I don’t think doctors could simply prescribe medicines not covered by the health plan, but pharmacists would have the authority to give me a nebulizer even though it’s not prescribed. Here, it’s actually illegal for the pharmacist to do that (I think in general pharmacy may be a better job in Montreal than here, but IDK). However, the pharmacist got ahold of the prescribing doctor at 8:30pm on a Friday night and got the nebulizer prescription. I also got ahold of someone on the floor where I’d been admitted and they also paged a doctor. Neither of those things would be likely to have happened in Montreal. No inhaler for now but I should be ok. So in short, this kind of routine mistake can be fixed in both places but the process through which that might happen reveals a lot about power and resources.

Labour and infrastructure: Of course the US hospital was more beautiful, though I also think my Sherpa’s advice to go to the suburbs made a difference here. I got admitted to the ER fast. I somehow got a private room, but most people don’t, whereas I was able to simply get a private room covered in Montreal when I was hospitalized in 2010. On my admitting floor, nurses appeared to have a caseload of about 4-5 patients per nurse, which I suspect is much lower than something like the Glen or the Jewish. Quality of care was great, but also similar. I’ve had exactly one bad nurse in my life (Nurse Mike, covered in Diminished Faculties) and all of the staff have been kind and careful here and at home. Food was ok, probably better than Montreal but one doesn’t get hospitalized for the cuisine. Vegan options limited but that’s expected. I did have a person on the food order line at Wellesley Newton get surprisingly cranky with me when I asked for a ripe banana with my meal. But the response to the request was so disproportionate it was easy for me to say “that’s obviously not about me.”

The banana I got for that meal was pretty green but it was good the next day.

Probably Not Cancer Crawl: 26 Sep 2024

There are so many things I want to tell you about! This is not that post.

On August 26th I moved into my Cambridge apartment. Carrie and I drove down a U-haul, and up and down the stairs we went carrying boxes. Sure I got winded but it was normal. I walked around and did stuff. We saw people and ran errands.

By last Wednesday, I knew something was really wrong. I’d thought I’d had a flareup of concussion symptoms from all stress of moving. But now I was short of breath. Like really. Tuesday I was so tired I left work early. Wednesday, I spent a day fumbling around the US medical system and missing Quebec (“you can’t get a referral without establishing primary care first” “there’s a big backup on primary care” “no, that person listed as accepting patients isn’t accepting patients” “how about an appointment for your acute symptoms on December 31st?”). By Thursday a triage nurse on the phone advised me to go to urgent care. So I did.

After a $55 copay, some interviewing and tests, the physician’s assistant at urgent care diagnosed me with pneumonia and sent me home with antibiotics and cough suppressants. I stayed home Friday and took it easy over the weekend. Monday morning I was worse, not better: I got winded while standing up from a chair. On friends’ advice, I went to an emergency room in the suburbs, specifically Newton-Wellesley. I was admitted immediately. (Trouble breathing gets you well triaged.) They did more tests. No pulmonary embolism. My heart is in awesome shape. Even if I have aspirated some food because of my paralyzed vocal cord, that’s unlikely to be the cause.

But I was un-diagnosed with pneumonia. Or downgraded to maybe. After 3 days of oxygen, IV antibiotics, IV steroids (RAWK!!!!), and a suite of asthma meds, I can breathe deeply again. My oxygen levels are good enough that I can walk around and don’t need extra oxygen.

I may be released today or tomorrow, depending on how I do on stairs and what doctors say.

But I still don’t know what really wrong with me. I have what can best be described as a “terrifying Old Jewish Man” cough. I could write you a book about phlegm, but will spare you. When I lie down, my oxygen levels drop. The current theories are:

My cancer. This is the local favourite but I’m not buying it. This is all from doctors who do not specialize in cancer, or my very specific kind. I had a CT in August that showed no significant progression. I had another CT on Monday and the report reads almost identical to August’s. I want to hear this from an oncologist who knows something about my cancer. The American medical system is very, um, aggressive, and goes straight to KILL MODE with cancer. Except counterintuitively, I don’t know that my kind of cancer (army specific case) actually affects breathing despite its residence in my lungs. I talk with my oncologist tomorrow.
Asthma. I have it. Maybe I just need stronger treatments? I am responding well to a nebulizer.
Some kind of lung infection that’s either sorta pneumonia or something else. Probably bacterial. If it’s viral, I’m not contagious. I am responding very well to steroids and maybe antibiotics.
Allergies. Maybe something in the environment or my apartment.
Very low possibilities: long Covid, obesity hypoventilation.

I will probably go home today or tomorrow. I will have followup with a pulmonologist next week, and this experience has also netted me a very useful referral to a local oncologist with expertise in my kind of cancer, which will be great for coordinating care with my Montreal team while I’m here.

The people at the hospital have been very nice. I may have actually convinced a nurse here who is a budding drummer to start her own punk band. I’ve had lots of medical professionals come through and learned a lot about my body, including some useful revelations about my swallowing. Yesterday morning felt like office hours before a paper was due, except it was all medical people coming to see me.

I’ve had a great support network here even though Carrie is three time zones away. She’s on a major grant deadline so this added to her stress big time. We discussed her flying out but in the end decided against it. All those years of teaching disability studies (#carewebs) have totally disinhibited me from asking for help. I have some old friends here who have been fantastic. One is a chronic illness sherpa who has helped me navigate the system. Two friends from Montreal who are also here on sabbatical, have driven me here, waited with me, and broken into my apartment for stuff. But also other fellows have really shown up. I got three lovely cards from the Institute with lots of great personal messages, along with some very nice personal emails. Someone broke into my office and got my computer so I could write this note. And I’ve had as many room visits from friends as I can handle.

I had a very intense medical year since last September and fantasized about just maintaining while I’m here and focusing on being a person. But with chronic illness you don’t get to choose. At least I should be back to sabbaticaling next week.

A few other thoughts on healthcare here vs home:

I am very glad to have a sabbatical gig with a proper health plan to cover all this. I a lot of other US sabbatical fellowships don’t come with full insurance. That would have put me in a position where I’d have to go back to Montreal for proper care. I would not want to be un- or underinsured in this system.

Despite all our complaining about Quebec healthcare, a place like Cambridge MA with a great reputation for healthcare has a lot of the same issues in terms of a new person accessing it. I was told that private equity sent a local hospital into bankruptcy here and issued a bunch of people out into the system needing primary care doctors. There was massive burnout and systemic breakdown during Covid, etc. etc. But also like Quebec, once you’re in the system, the wheels seem to turn a lot more smoothly. (I will be testing this over the next few weeks.)

The US healthcare system asks a lot of personal and somewhat invasive questions at intake. Race, ethnicity, religion, religious beliefs, history of drug use, lots of detailed question about alcohol (lol one drink in the last month), though oddly not much about chronic illness or disability (would seem more important for intake into a medical system?) I got asked about my gender identity and sexual orientation so many times I reached a point of saying “I am cross appointed in gender studies, I honestly don’t know how to answer those questions anymore.” Which is actually true, but a story for another time.

—

Image desc: a video monitor with waveforms for my heart rate, oxygen levels, and breathing rate and numbers next to the waveforms.

Bonus nerd content: I’ve been very intimate with this here monitor in my room for the last three days. There have been a couple moments where it almost looks like the three waveforms on my Buchla 208: spike waveform (the top), rounded square wave (bottom), and folded sine / triangle (middle). It’s not so close here but it’s the best I can do.

Ten Things I Learned From Will Straw

On Monday June 15th we had a wonderful retirement symposium for Will Straw. In addition to co-organizing, I was charged with giving an overview of his career. I concluded with a list of 10 things I learned from Will (lest you think this is original, Sheryl Hamilton had a similar idea). There will be a longer publication in the future, which may or may not include these 10 points, so here they are.

Always be reading. Will reads with a passion—and speed—that few others can match. But especially for mid-career academics, when so many other things are vying for our attention, Will’s commitment to books is something to be emulated. We are only good at our jobs if we are immersed in others’ ideas as well as our own.
Take advantage of where you are. Wherever you are, there are going to be multiple scenes. They will all have something to offer you, if you let them.
Follow your interests wherever they may lead you, especially if they lead you to the flea market over on St. Michel, or its metaphorical equivalent.
Step up when it’s your time to do so. Academic communities are fragile things, and we all need to contribute to keep them thriving.
Especially while you’re in the process of stepping up, ask what your time is worth. I think he originally said this to me as we were hopping into a taxi instead of taking public transit somewhere, and perhaps it sounds a little bourgeois. But for those of us with the resources to make these kinds of choices, sometimes it’s worth spending a little more to do a little more.
Meet and learn from the next generation of scholars, not just the last.
Use travel to continue your education.
Beware of empty ambition. For instance, if you are worried about the work you’ll have to do if you actually get the grant, you probably shouldn’t apply for the grant.
Don’t let the bustle of academic life take you away from everyday small pleasures or your bigger passions. Find a way to keep it all in proportion.
For those of us with these nice professor jobs: be aware of your privilege and exercise gratitude. Never be bitter or resentful. Be principled, but never give in to the urge to grandstand.
Linen.

Music News

I’ve got some gigs coming up. These will probably be my last in Montreal until sometime later in 2025, since I’m away on sabbatical. Though there’s always a chance of a brief return visit.

Tl;dr:

Jonathan Sterne solo synth act, Saturday 15 June 2024, 5:30pm

Hard Red Spring, Wednesday 19 June, 8:00pm

Volte, Monday 19 August, 8pm

Please come! Bring friends!

More details:

Saturday 15 June, Rocket Science Room, 170 Jean-Talon Ouest (Atlas Building), #204, at the very reasonable hour of 5:30 start time. I’m performing solo on synth to launch the book “Modular Synthesis: Patching Machines and People.” I’m on a bill with Ky Brooks and Lisa Conway. We’re all doing 20 minute sets follows by a roundtable discussion. This will be a weird one because I’ll also say a couple words about the book before I launch into playing. I go first so show up on time. High nerdery.

—

Wednesday 19 June, 8:30pm, Hard Red Spring will be playing two sets (no opener) at l’escogriffe bar, 4461 rue St Denis. East side of the street, just “south” of Mont-Royal. See some of your favourite profs play lyrically-driven rock songs. The big news is that Carrie is singing more. I play bass. Lots of new material (is it power pop?), plus a range of stuff from our last three records.

https://hardredspring.bandcamp.com/album/victorian-poison

https://hardredspring.bandcamp.com/album/how-high-the-water

https://hardredspring.bandcamp.com/album/tactical-unit-of-rock-summerpool

—

Volte, my instrumental post-rock trio (some might say “progressive”!) will be doing an album launch for our new record, Vrittis, on Monday 19 August, 8pm at Turbo Haus. I play touch guitar (often in bass role but I venture higher) and synthesizer. More news forthcoming, but please save the date.

Quick Guggenheim Awards Reception Review

I made a very quick trip to New York to attend the Guggenheim award reception and I’m glad I did. It was largely a reception where you walk around and talk with other fellows. Most of them were from 2024, but there were some from 2014, 2004, 1994, 1984 and I even met a poet from 1974! I appreciated the unstructured nature of the thing, and the opportunity to just talk with people. Halfway through the president made a few short remarks, and some of them were even a little inspiring (about the importance of arts and intellectual work). Then it was back to socializing. A model of an awards even for me. No endless reading of names or marching up on a stage to get something. Just a 3-hour party with a 3-minute speech.

I asked a fellow from 2004 whether and how the Guggenheim Fellowship changed her life. She replied that she would answer how it “should have” changed her life. Basically, she recommended we use as a cure for imposter syndrome. Anytime we doubt ourselves, or our right to do or say something, we should remember “well, at least I’m a Guggenheim Fellow.” I pass it along in case it is helpful to someone else.* I see no reason why once couldn’t insert other awards or achievements, though I do have to say that so far it seems the Guggenheim has a strange, prestigious pull on people.

—

I didn’t know what to expect, so I’m leaving this here for the search engines:

The reception took place at the Century Association in New York, which I learned is a famous private club. I’ve been in a few of these places in Montreal and am usually kind of allergic to them (don’t forget to scroll down to the date when they first admitted women!) but it was a nice site for the event.

Dress code was all over. I was really unsure of what to wear. Lots of people did standard academic (men in jackets and button-down shirts, women in the wider range of dress clothes). Though some people dressed truly fabulously, which I really appreciated and enjoyed, and might have done myself with some forethought. Some people came in very casual dress. Nobody cared at all, except to note when people were truly fabulously dressed. I went with the “nice shirt” approach since I figured I would die in a jacket. I was right. I would have died in a jacket.

The big surprise for me is a lot of people brought business cards. I did not because in my experience, the only people who want my card anymore (or have one) are in engineering or the tech world. So: bring business cards? Or other cards to give out?

Snacks were standard issue reception snacks. Unlikely any were vegan. I took a chance on a mushroom tart and–I dunno. But the person sitting next to me was very excited to learn I was vegan. I had to correct them that I was a “shitty vegan” and their reply was “you’re doing the best you can.” (I am probably not.)

But: afterwards. I went out to Mala Project, which is a fantastic Sichuan Restaurant with great vegan options. Fresh lotus root!

—

*A MacArthur Fellow–which is a much more exclusive club–once told me that winning it put a lot of pressure on them because they felt like every bit of work they did afterwards had to merit “genius” accolades. So these awards don’t automatically cure imposter syndrome. But it’s a nice thought.

“What’s a Guggenheim?” (aka the promised good news post)

So this post echoes my insane fall of applications post. First of all: probably nobody should ever apply for 11 things like I did. But it was a hell of a good year professionally.

Tl;dr: we will be in two places next year. Carrie will be based at the Center for Advanced Studies in Behavioral Sciences at Stanford. I will be based at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Studies at Harvard. To my great surprise, I also won a Guggenheim fellowship, which I’m deferring to 2026, but as you read this post (if it’s Monday) I’m on a very quick trip to New York City for a celebratory reception at the Foundation on Tuesday (back home Weds AM, so sorry NYC friends–I’ll see you next time!).

I’ll start with where we screwed up so you can avoid our mistakes if you want to. As mentioned in the fall post, we missed most of the deadlines for Europe, which are about two years out from the fellowship date. So we will be spending sabbatical in the US during a presidential election year. That choice is almost certainly ill advised.

Second, our plan was to apply all over and do what was “best for the family.” That turned out to be an option we hadn’t considered when we were applying. In the end, I had no offers on the west coast and Carrie had none on the east coast. And we did not feel like we could ask the other person to turn down the very good offers we both had. And Harvard has great US healthcare while Stanford has no healthcare plan for fellows.* So we decided to live apart for 8 months. Carrie gets the cats because a) I will spend January, June, July, and my fall and spring breaks in California and b) we found a place that takes cats there. She’ll come visit me in between my longer visits to her. I think if the most important goal is to be together then the plan has to be more geographically targeted, or perhaps only one partner applies, or we suck it up and one of us turns something down. In the end, Carrie suggested we take both, and I came around to the idea.

We don’t love the idea of being apart for several months. But we have commuted before and can do it again. It’s temporary. We have friends in both places to look after us. And we’ve gotten great advice from couples who’ve commuted. We will try and see what works for us.

On the flip side, we both DO love the opportunities we have. For me, the Radcliffe setup is great, and I’ll have some nice resources there. Cambridge is ideal for me intellectually next year. I have tons of colleagues in the area who can help me think about both projects I’ll be working on, and I’ll be an easy visit for Mara Mills, with whom I’m working on a project. And for the AI and sound book you’d think Silicon Valley might be better. But it’s not and I’ll still get to go there if I need to. Carrie’s Stanford is great but it’s my blog and so I’ll let her speak for herself if she wants.

“What about the Guggenheim?” you ask. Right. When I was an undergrad I remember one of my profs talking about one of my other profs “being on a Guggenheim” with great reverence. I didn’t really know what that was. It’s a fellowship. It seems to mostly be a career achievement fellowship, though you do apply with a project. Before this year, I’d had a lot of success as a letter-writer in support of others’ applications, but no success of my own. I’m not sure what got me over the hump this year–could be aging, other credentials now on my CV, a topical proposal, or a book contract (I normally never bother with advance book contracts). Like all these things, they are named for long-dead philanthropists. Most come with more prestige than money.** In this case, the Guggenheims were a Jewish family that arrived in New York in the 1850s and made their fortune in mining. Their names are now all over museums and other philanthropy. I don’t think mining in the 19th century was any nicer than it is now, so like all of these things, “there is no document of civilization which is not at the same time a document of barbarism.”

At Harvard, I am the “William and Flora Hewlett Fellow.” That’s the Hewlett in Hewlett-Packard.

—

*yes we keep Quebec healthcare but they pay at Quebec rates which don’t go far in the US.

**exceptions: MacArthur and Killam.